Not pictured: the fat spliff under the cops hat |
In response to Mr. Eddie Valle's "Marijuana and Alcohol", while I agree wholeheartedly that the
legalization of a certain green, leafy substance, especially when
compared to other currently legal recreational intoxicants, should be
a no-brain-er. Unfortunately, the issue is much, much more
complicated than simply legalization and taxation of said substance.
We have no way of testing for marijuana "intoxication"
levels (example: You cannot be over X% high and be behind the wheel).
Basically, reform in the area of recreational drug use would have to
be accompanied by reform in other numerous institutions. Hiring
companies across the U.S. would have to adopt a more lenient approach
to the hiring process, as they certainly could not be expected to
discriminate against marijuana users. Can you imagine answering yes
or no to "Do you imbibe in any way, shape, or form Marijuana or
any of its derivatives?" on a job application? I certainly could
not. Answering a questions like that geared towards alcohol is
illegal. Provided you do nothing to introduce alcohol into your own
work environment, your work/management has no right to know what you
do on your own time. While the disparity between damage done through
Alcohol vs. Marijuana is without question, the age-old arguments for
marijuana legalization have not worked historically because they do
little to answer the more important issues of implementation. I have
no doubt that the U.S. will get there, in time. Hell, when it does
happen, it may just be the political re-alignment everyone's been
waiting for.
No comments:
Post a Comment